South African prosecutors say they’re going to no longer pursue legal fees in opposition to President Cyril Ramaphosa relating to the debatable farm robbery scandal that almost introduced unwell the president two years in the past.

A former secret agent prominent laid a legal criticism in opposition to Ramaphosa, accusing him of committing irregularities in looking to disguise the robbery of $4m (£3.25m) in money at his sport farm within the north-eastern Limpopo province.

The president denied any wrongdoing, pronouncing that the cash stolen from his settee in 2020 got here from the authentic sale of buffaloes at his Phala Phala farm.

The verdict no longer to deliver any fees in opposition to Ramaphosa or somebody else got here later “a comprehensive investigation process”, prosecutors mentioned.

Ramaphosa survived the so-called “farmgate” scandal and used to be re-elected as president in June, albeit later being compelled to method a coalition, presen the legal investigations had been nonetheless ongoing.

In 2022, his African Nationwide Congress (ANC) impaired its majority to stop an impeachment movement in opposition to him over the scandal.

Ultimate month, the anti-corruption watchdog cleared Ramaphosa amid requires him to surrender.

Arthur Fraser, who headed the condition safety company between 2016 and 2018, claimed that Ramaphosa concealed the farm robbery from police and tax government and in lieu organised the abduction and wondering of the robbers in an try to quietness them.

The president used to be additionally accused of cash laundering, tax evasion and breaching foreign currencies regulations over the money, which used to be in US bucks.

Ramaphosa stated the housebreaking however denied the legal allegations, pronouncing he had reported the break-in to the police.

He has additionally disputed the amount of cash concerned and mentioned it got here from authentic gross sales of sport from his animal-breeding farm.

The extremely publicised housebreaking threw Ramaphosa’s executive into turmoil forward of a a very powerful celebration management vote.

However an investigation into the topic has discovered inadequate proof of corruption and cash laundering, the Nationwide Prosecuting Authority (NPA) mentioned on Thursday.

In a remark, Director of Nation Prosecutions in Limpopo Ivy Thenga mentioned the verdict to not prosecute Ramaphosa used to be taken later a “careful assessment” of all to be had proof offered to the prosecutors by way of the Directorate for Precedence Crime Investigation (DPCI).

“The available evidence presented to prosecutors cannot sustain any charge,” NPA spokesman Mthunzi Mhaga mentioned.

The probe additionally coated any imaginable contravention of source of revenue tax and change keep an eye on rules, the prosecutor added.

The case in opposition to 3 society accused of breaking into Ramaphosa’s farm is ready to proceed after life.

They seemed at a Limpopo courtroom previous this time on a number of fees, together with cash laundering and house-breaking.